Before anyone hires you, they ask ChatGPT about you first. This shows you what it can actually read.
Four checks, about ten seconds. Your site, or your LinkedIn if the site is out of date. No sign-up, no card.
They never tell you they looked.
Your site, or your LinkedIn if the site is out of date. We fetch the page, your robots file, your llms.txt and your sitemap at once.
Crawler access, the file that explains you, the markup naming you, and whether your writing can be quoted.
A score, what each check found in plain language, and a fix list ranked by what moves first.
Get a clear plan to dominate your industry across AI search platforms.
Book a strategy callAn AI system answering a question about you does not read your website the way a person does. It checks four things: whether it is allowed in, whether a file exists explaining who you are, whether the page carries markup naming you, and whether your writing can be quoted.
A site that ranks well on Google can still be invisible in AI answers. Fewer than one in ten pages cited by ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot rank in Google's top ten for the same question.
This check reads what a machine reads: your page, your robots file, your llms.txt and your sitemap. It scores twenty seven signals across six categories in about ten seconds.
For an expert whose name is the product, the markup naming you as a person is usually the biggest gap and the fastest thing to fix.
SEO audits were built for a page of ten blue links. Keywords, backlinks, page speed. Those decide whether you appear in a list someone still has to read.
AI does not hand over a list. It answers, and it names a few people. Whether you are one of them depends on whether a machine can work out who you are, not on how many sites link to you. A consultant with a small site and clean markup gets named ahead of a better known one whose site says nothing a machine can parse.
This is not a discipline problem. The rules changed quietly. Search used to be a list of ten links you could work your way up. Now it is one answer with three names in it, and almost nobody updated their site for that.
Nine crawlers, including the ones behind ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. If any are turned away, nothing else you fix matters.
llms.txt, a short plain-text summary of who you are and who you serve. Most sites do not have one.
The code saying you are a person, what you do, and which profiles belong to you. Usually the biggest gap.
Headings, structure, and whether you answer questions outright instead of circling them.
Two dated reports. One on my own site. One for a client who paid me to do this work.
Check it yourself: streamlabai.com/robots.txt, /sitemap.xml, /llms.txt. All three were 404 in March.
From the visibility report delivered 20 Mar 2026. The starting figure is calculated back from the reported 129% change.
Work the fixes in this order. The first two clear hard blockers. The rest compound how often you get named.
A check of whether AI systems can find, read and repeat who you are. Regular SEO asks whether you rank in a list of links. This asks whether you get named in an answer.
Usually one of three reasons. Your site turns the crawlers away, there is no markup telling it you are a person worth naming, or your bio says different things in different places so it cannot tell which is true.
Yes. No account and no card. The score is instant. The fix plan asks for an email so it can be sent to you.
Above 80 means the mechanics are sound and what is left is reputation. Below 40 means an AI asked about you is guessing.
You have spent years becoming the person people should call.
Right now a machine is answering that question for you, and it has never heard of you.
A free strategy call. You keep your audit either way.